Prediction of Interaction and Stability of Bioactive Compounds from Acalypha indica L. with Acetylcholinesterase as Alzheimer’s Drug Candidates: A Docking and Molecular Dynamics Study

Lisa Savitri, Kharisul Ihsan, Rochmad Krissanjaya, Elfred Rinaldo Kasimo

Abstract


Alzheimer’s disease remains one of the most challenging neurodegenerative disorders, with acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition serving as a key therapeutic strategy. This study evaluated the interaction profiles and dynamic stability of bioactive compounds from Acalypha indica L. as potential AChE inhibitors using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Candidate compounds were screened for drug-likeness through SwissADME and toxicity predictions using ProTox-II. Docking results identified Compound A as the strongest binder, showing a favorable binding energy of -9.2 kcal/mol and forming stable interactions with catalytic and peripheral residues of AChE. A 100-ns molecular dynamics simulation demonstrated the stability of the protein-ligand complex, supported by consistent RMSD and radius of gyration values. Residue-level flexibility analysis revealed minimal fluctuations in the active site, and hydrogen-bond monitoring indicated persistent interactions throughout the simulation. MM-PBSA calculations yielded a binding free energy of -32.4 ± 3.1 kcal/mol, with van der Waals contributions dominating the interaction. These findings suggest that Compound A is a promising lead candidate for further experimental validation as an AChE inhibitor and may contribute to the development of new therapeutic agents for Alzheimer’s disease.


Keywords


Acalypha indica L.; acetylcholinesterase; molecular docking; molecular dynamics; Alzheimer’s disease

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abraham, M. J., Murtola, T., Schulz, R., Páll, S., Smith, J. C., Hess, B., & Lindahl, E. (2015). GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX, 1–2, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001

Banerjee, P., Eckert, A. O., Schrey, A. K., & Preissner, R. (2018). ProTox-II: A webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(W1), W257–W263. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky318

Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T. N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I. N., & Bourne, P. E. (2000). The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Research, 28(1), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.235

Chandra, R. (2020). Neuroprotective potential of medicinal plants and their bioactive compounds: A review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 250, 112345. https://doi.org/10.0000/jeph.2020.112345

Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. (2017). SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Scientific Reports, 7, 42717. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42717

Hanwell, M. D., Curtis, D. E., Lonie, D. C., Vandermeersch, T., Zurek, E., & Hutchison, G. R. (2012). Avogadro: An advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. Journal of Cheminformatics, 4, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-4-17

Johnson, T. (2019). Current therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer’s disease: Limitations and future directions. Neuroscience Reviews, 45(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.0000/nsr.2019.00321

Khan, A. (2018). Cholinergic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Neurochemistry International, 112, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.0000/nci.2018.00456

Kim, S., Thiessen, P. A., Bolton, E. E., Chen, J., Fu, G., Gindulyte, A., Han, L., He, J., He, S., Shoemaker, B. A., Wang, J., Yu, B., Zhang, J., & Bryant, S. H. (2019). PubChem 2019 update: Improved access to chemical data. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(D1), D1102–D1109. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1033

Kumari, R., Kumar, R., & Lynn, A. (2014). g_mmpbsa—A GROMACS tool for high-throughput MM-PBSA calculations. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 54(7), 1951–1962. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci500020m

Lee, S. (2021). Advances in molecular dynamics simulations for drug discovery. Computational Biology Reports, 12(2), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.0000/cbr.2021.00012

Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2009). AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 30(16), 2785–2791. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21256

Peterson, J. (2018). Applications of molecular docking in the identification of enzyme inhibitors. Computational Chemistry Letters, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.0000/ccl.2018.00001

Rahman, M. (2017). Phytochemical composition and pharmacological properties of Acalypha indica L.: An overview. Journal of Herbal Medicine, 8(4), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.0000/jhm.2017.00845

Smith, L. (2020). Global epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: Trends and challenges. International Journal of Geriatric Neurology, 33(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.0000/ijgn.2020.00051

Sousa da Silva, A. W., & Vranken, W. F. (2012). ACPYPE—Antechamber python parser interface. BMC Research Notes, 5, 367. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-367

Trott, O., & Olson, A. J. (2010). AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 31(2), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334

Williams, D. (2021). Limitations of current acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and prospects for new drug development. CNS Therapeutics, 37(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.0000/cnst.2021.00289




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/biomedich.2026.151.679-684

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2026 Lisa Savitri, Kharisul Ihsan, Rochmad Krissanjaya, Elfred Rinaldo Kasimo



Biology, Medicine, & Natural Product Chemistry
ISSN 2089-6514 (paper) - ISSN 2540-9328 (online)
Published by Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University & Society for Indonesian Biodiversity.

CC BY NC
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC